[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2?
From: |
Bent |
Subject: |
Re: [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:14:38 +0200 |
Simon,
I have recompiled Linphone with these lines:
make clean
LDFLAGS=-g make
But the result is almost the same; there are slight differences in the
back-trace and an extra line:
Backtrace stopped: previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?).
I have been using a self-compiled version of Linphone all the time. I
checked the Makefile and it has these two lines (not at the same
spot):
CFLAGS = -g -O2
LDFLAGS =
as you had mentioned. This made me try the exercise with the LDFLAGS=
Could it be something with the version of gcc? I seem to remember from
the Ekiga list that the gcc version *could* play a role. My gcc is
4.3.2 and the advice on the Ekiga list was to use either 4.4 or 4.2
for reasons I can't remember.
So: what do I best do now?
Another observation, which I should have included in the very first
post: When I preload the compatibility library, it doesn't matter
which version of V4L I choose, both work equally well. The V4L2
version should fail, shouldn't it?
Kind regards,
Bent
typescript
Description: Binary data
- [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2?, Bent, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2?, Simon Morlat, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2?, Bent, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2?, Simon Morlat, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2?,
Bent <=
- Re: [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2?, Simon Morlat, 2009/06/29
- Re: [Linphone-users] Is Linphone 3.2.1 v4l or v4l2?, Bent, 2009/06/29