Re: [Linphone-users] make error during cross compiling "Linphone" for powerpc-405

[Simon Morlat]

Hi,

Please make sure you are using the lastest version of speex software.

Simon

Le mercredi 7 février 2007 11:39, venkatram mustoor a écrit :
> Hi All,
> I am trying to cross  compile "Linphone" onto powerpc-405, but I get
> these errors when i type                   "make."
>
>
> speexec.c: In function `speex_ec_process':
> speexec.c:112: `spx_int32_t' undeclared (first use in this function)
> speexec.c:112: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> speexec.c:112: for each function it appears in.)
> speexec.c:112: `noise' undeclared (first use in this function)
> speexec.c:112: parse error before ')' token
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
> speexec.c:133: warning: implicit declaration of function
> `speex_echo_state_reset'
> make[5]: *** [speexec.lo] Error 1
> make[5]: Leaving directory
> `/home/umesh/IPPHONE/linphone-1.5.1/mediastreamer2/src'
> make[4]: *** [all] Error 2
> make[4]: Leaving directory
> `/home/umesh/IPPHONE/linphone-1.5.1/mediastreamer2/src'
> make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[3]: Leaving directory
> `/home/umesh/IPPHONE/linphone-1.5.1/mediastreamer2' make[2]: *** [all]
> Error 2
> make[2]: Leaving directory
> `/home/umesh/IPPHONE/linphone-1.5.1/mediastreamer2' make[1]: ***
> [all-recursive] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/umesh/IPPHONE/linphone-1.5.1'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
>
> Please help me as whats causing speex.lo error to occur.
>
>
> On 2/6/07, address@hidden
>
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Send Linphone-users mailing list submissions to
> >     address@hidden
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >     http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >     address@hidden
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >     address@hidden
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Linphone-users digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1.  Failing registration with Asterisk (Jong-won Choi)
> >    2.  Re: Failing registration with Asterisk (Petr Pisar)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 06 Feb 2007 12:59:21 +0900
> > From: Jong-won Choi <address@hidden>
> > Subject: [Linphone-users] Failing registration with Asterisk
> > To: address@hidden
> > Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
> >
> > Hi Linphone Users
> >
> > The problem happens with Linphone 1.6.0 and Asterisk 1.4.0.
> > Currently I use linphonec - command line Linphone.
> >
> > I turned on verbose log message and found a strange log line during the
> > register session:
> >
> >                    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [::1]:5050;branch=....
> >
> > It seems like Asterisk can't handle '[' and ']' part correctly based on
> > Asterisk's log message.
> >
> > I guess correcting '[::1]:5050' (I changed the port from 5060) to the
> > machine address like '192.168.1.100:5050' may fix this problem, but I
> > don't know how to do that.
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Jong-won
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:20:28 +0000 (UTC)
> > From: Petr Pisar <address@hidden>
> > Subject: [Linphone-users] Re: Failing registration with Asterisk
> > To: address@hidden
> > Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> >
> > On 2007-02-06, Jong-won Choi <address@hidden> wrote:
> > > The problem happens with Linphone 1.6.0 and Asterisk 1.4.0.
> > >
> > >                    Via: SIP/2.0/UDP [::1]:5050;branch=....
> > >
> > > It seems like Asterisk can't handle '[' and ']' part correctly based on
> > > Asterisk's log message.
> >
> > If this is true, than Asterisk doesn't conform to SIP and IPv6 URI
> > specification. The problem is in Asterisk, not in Linphone.
> >
> > On the other hand Via: [::1] should not be the first Via header, because
> > it points to the loopback network device and it would not have any sence
> > to route the message in this way.
> >
> > > I guess correcting '[::1]:5050' (I changed the port from 5060) to the
> > > machine address like '192.168.1.100:5050' may fix this problem, but I
> > > don't know how to do that.
> >
> > No, becuase the colon (':') use integral part of IPv6 address. The above
> > syntax is Ok.
> >
> > -- Petr
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linphone-users mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users
> >
> >
> > End of Linphone-users Digest, Vol 51, Issue 3
> > *********************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-users