|
From: | Matt Lawson |
Subject: | [Linphone-users] Audio vs. video priority? |
Date: | Tue, 16 Dec 2003 09:37:28 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020623 Debian/1.0.0-0.woody.1 |
What I notice is that the video stays together pretty well, but the audio breaks up horribly when bandwidth starts to run out.
My question is, is there any way to give the audio stream "priority" over the video? With a video call, the image is a 'bonus' but the users will expect the audio to be perfect, or at least understandable.
The way our Linphone is now (it is not exactly like the CVS version, because it is a few months old), it uses the normal audio timer sync (20ms or whatever it is) and uses "no sync" for the video. We discovered that this gave the best image quality. But I wonder, is that causing the audio to be lost in favor of video? Should I put the video on a timer also? Or should I change the audio to "no sync" as well? Is there any other way to tweak it so that audio will be sure to come through at the expense of the video?
Suggestions welcome. Thanks. - Matt
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |