Re: [Linphone-developers] Port to libeXosip v4

[Eli Burke]

Guillaume,

Could we get a similar statement about the reason you guys created your own 
ZRTP implementation (“bzrtp”)? 

Has it been tested for interoperability with ZRTP implementations used by other 
VOIP products?

Thanks, 
Eli

On Apr 9, 2014, at 12:01 PM, address@hidden wrote:

> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 10:04:24 +0200
> From: Guillaume Beraudo <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Linphone-developers] Port to libeXosip v4
> Message-ID: <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> 
> Hi Leonard,
> 
> There have been anouncements on the list.
> For example on January 8th Margaux stated:
> 
> +Liblinphone level improvements thanks to new "belle-sip" SIP stack:
> * multiple SIP transports simultaneously now allowed
> * IP dual stack: can use IPv6 and IPv4 simultaneously
> * fully asynchronous behavior: no more lengthly DNS or connections 
> * sip.instance parameter (RFC5626)
> * alias parameter (RFC5923)
> * better management of network disconnections
> * SIP/TLS handled through lightweight polarssl library (instead of
> * openssl)
> * SIP transaction state machines improved (RFC6026)
> * Privacy API (RFC3323, RFC3325)
> * Full support of rich presence in (RFC4480)
> * Better handling of sips scheme in URIs.
> 
> 
> Guillaume Beraudo

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail