Re: [Linphone-developers] Port to libeXosip v4

[Guillaume Beraudo]

Hi Leonard,


There have been anouncements on the list.
For example on January 8th Margaux stated:

+Liblinphone level improvements thanks to new "belle-sip" SIP stack:
* multiple SIP transports simultaneously now allowed
* IP dual stack: can use IPv6 and IPv4 simultaneously
* fully asynchronous behavior: no more lengthly DNS or connections 
* sip.instance parameter (RFC5626)
* alias parameter (RFC5923)
* better management of network disconnections
* SIP/TLS handled through lightweight polarssl library (instead of
* openssl)
* SIP transaction state machines improved (RFC6026)
* Privacy API (RFC3323, RFC3325)
* Full support of rich presence in (RFC4480)
* Better handling of sips scheme in URIs.


Guillaume Beraudo


On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 03:59:01AM +0000, Leonard Fodje wrote:
> Guillaume,
> 
> Any update on the incomplete response below?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Leonard
> 
> > Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:42:48 +0100
> > From: address@hidden
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [Linphone-developers] Port to libeXosip v4
> > 
> > Hi Leonard,
> > 
> > 
> > Indeed I could not find it.
> > The management will communicate on the rational when we release the 3.7.0,
> > the first desktop version with belle-sip.
> > 
> > I hope it will not take too long.
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry for the incomplete response.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Guillaume Beraudo
> > 
> > 
> > On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 02:52:02PM -0600, Leonard Fodje wrote:
> > > Hi Guillaume,
> > > 
> > > What are the rational and benefits of "belle-sip" over "exosip"?
> > > Can't see them anywhere on the list.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > 
> > > Leonard
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message----- From: Guillaume Beraudo
> > > Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 9:49 AM
> > > To: address@hidden
> > > Subject: Re: [Linphone-developers] Port to libeXosip v4
> > > 
> > > Hello Felix,
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your contribution.
> > > Exosip has been deprecated recently in favor of ¨belle-sip¨ (see
> > > rationals and
> > > benefits on the list).
> > > 
> > > However we will still provide bug fixes for the old stack for some time 
> > > and
> > > have a branch for it. It would be nice to merge your patch there.
> > > 
> > > I had a quick look to the patch: you should not change the sal functions
> > > signatures but instead access the exosip context in the salimpl through
> > > salopbase->root.
> > > Moreover, you should introduce a macro expanding to the exosip context:
> > > #ifdef HAVE_STRUCT_EXOSIP_T
> > > #define EXOCTX ctx->excontext,
> > > #endif
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > Guillaume Beraudo
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 06:31:32AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> > > >Dear Linphone developers,
> > > >
> > > >Attached please find a patch porting Linphone 3.6.1 to libeXosip v4. The
> > > >related 'autoconf' code was simplified, but everything should continue to
> > > >work for lower API versions.
> > > >
> > > >Regards,
> > > >Felix Lechner
> > > 
> > > 
> > > >_______________________________________________
> > > >Linphone-developers mailing list
> > > >address@hidden
> > > >https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linphone-developers mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers
> > > 
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Linphone-developers mailing list
> > > address@hidden
> > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linphone-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers
>                                         

> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers