Re: [Linphone-developers] I tried to generate an apk with different package name, as seen in README, but without effect. How to do?

[Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho]

Hi Sylvain.

I have followed your instructions. Everything seems to be ok. But I still have 
a pending question.

In my phone I have linphone-android downloaded and installed from Google Play. 
Let's say linphone A.
I also have in the same phone the linphone-android that I have compiled with a 
different package name, using custom-rules.xml modified . Let's say linphone B.

The software ddms that comes with Android SDK shows me that these 2 linphones 
have different App description. It is good.
Linphone A has App description: org.linphone.
Linphone B has App description: br.com.customer.product.

However, if I install linphone A first and then B, just A can be registered, 
even using different SIP accounts.
On the other hand, if I install B first and than A, just B can be registered, 
even using different SIP accounts.

Is this behavior correct? Should I check something more about package names? 
What?

Thank you !
Regards.

Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho.
++++++++++++++++++++++







Em 07/02/2014, às 16:55, Sylvain Berfini <address@hidden> escreveu:

> Hi Rodrigo,
> 
> No you don't have to rewrite manually the manifest inside the generated 
> apk, aapt does that on itself.
> If you want to check your apk, install it and use the android app 
> manager to check it's package.
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> ---
> Sylvain Berfini
> Software Engineer @ Belledonne Communications
> 
> Le 2014-02-07 19:08, Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho a écrit :
>> Hi Sylvain.
>> Thank you for your attention.
>> However, I'm still confused.
>> 
>> The command ...ANDROID-4.4/AAPT LIST LINPHONE-DEBUG.APK  still shows
>> me:
>> 
>> org/linphone/mediastream/MediastreamerActivity.wnin in the list.
>> 
>> So, I still have a folder structure org.linphone inside my apk. Is it
>> fine?
>> 
>> I also have read the appt man and it explains that (according to our
>> custom_rules.xml file) :
>> 
>> a) the manifest is rewritten. But I just see a new manifest in the the
>> new package (on ADT), after running make, not a rewritten one. So,
>> should I manually override the old manifest with the new one?
>> 
>> b) R.java is generated into a different package. I is ok. I saw it.
>> But, how to be sure that the new R.java was used when the apk was
>> built?
>> 
>> Is there any way to certify that my apk has the correct package, as
>> suggested by the custom_rules.xml file?
>> 
>> Thank you again.
>> Regards.
>> 
>> Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho.
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Em 07/02/2014, às 11:41, Sylvain Berfini
>> <address@hidden> escreveu:
>> 
>>> Hi Rodrigo,
>>> 
>>> Changing the package name in the custom_rules file has for effect to
>>> 
>>> call aapt with the --rename-manifest-package. Here's the
>>> documentation
>>> from aapt:
>>> --rename-manifest-package
>>> Rewrite the manifest so that its package name is the package name
>>> given here. Relative class names (for example .Foo) will be
>>> changed to absolute names with the old package so that the code
>>> does not need to change.
>>> 
>>> Basically it doesn't change anything in the code, it only change the
>>> 
>>> package name used to identify the application (and so it changes the
>>> 
>>> install path on the device), and it's also used when the app log
>>> messages in logcat.
>>> 
>>> Cheers.
>>> 
>>> ---
>>> Sylvain Berfini
>>> Software Engineer @ Belledonne Communications
>>> 
>>> Le 2014-02-07 14:31, Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Hi.
>>>> 
>>>> I have followed the README file, changing the custom_rules.xml
>>>> accordingly (to generate a new apk with different package name),
>>>> and
>>>> run the make clean + make.
>>>> The apk was generated. So I investigated it inside and I didn't
>>>> see my
>>>> new package name in any file there. So, the changed custom_rules
>>>> .xml
>>>> file did not take effect over the apk.
>>>> 
>>>> However, in folder gen, seen via ADT, I see a new package and it
>>>> has
>>>> exactly the new wanted name. So, I suspect that I still have to do
>>>> something with it. But, what?
>>>> 
>>>> Any hint will be very helpful!
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks a lot.
>>>> 
>>>> Rodrigo.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Linphone-developers mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linphone-developers mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers
>> 
>> !DSPAM:52f520d119891922821469!
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linphone-developers mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers
>> 
>> 
>> !DSPAM:52f520d119891922821469!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers