Re: [Linphone-developers] Port to libeXosip v4

[Leonard Fodje]

Hi Guillaume,

What are the rational and benefits of "belle-sip" over "exosip"? Can't see 
them anywhere on the list.

Thanks,

Leonard

-----Original Message----- 
From: Guillaume Beraudo
Sent: Monday, August 5, 2013 9:49 AM
To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Linphone-developers] Port to libeXosip v4

Hello Felix,

Thanks for your contribution.
Exosip has been deprecated recently in favor of ¨belle-sip¨ (see rationals 
and
benefits on the list).

However we will still provide bug fixes for the old stack for some time and
have a branch for it. It would be nice to merge your patch there.

I had a quick look to the patch: you should not change the sal functions
signatures but instead access the exosip context in the salimpl through
salopbase->root.
Moreover, you should introduce a macro expanding to the exosip context:
#ifdef HAVE_STRUCT_EXOSIP_T
#define EXOCTX ctx->excontext,
#endif



Regards,
Guillaume Beraudo

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 06:31:32AM -0700, Felix Lechner wrote:
> Dear Linphone developers,
>
> Attached please find a patch porting Linphone 3.6.1 to libeXosip v4. The
> related 'autoconf' code was simplified, but everything should continue to
> work for lower API versions.
>
> Regards,
> Felix Lechner


> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers


_______________________________________________
Linphone-developers mailing list
address@hidden
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers