linphone-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Linphone-developers] Initializing linphonec daemon in -V mode via l


From: Henrik Pauli
Subject: Re: [Linphone-developers] Initializing linphonec daemon in -V mode via linphonecsh
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 11:11:19 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130215 Thunderbird/17.0.3

Guys, any chance of getting this patch in before you finish the next version?

For me, it's useful because it allows me to specify config file on command line.

2012.09.28. 12:31 keltezéssel, Henrik Pauli írta:
This still seems to be the case with Linphone 3.5.2, so I made a patch
which hopefully doesn't leak and fixes the issue under Windows.  I'm not
a C programmer, so there might be things that are awkward in this code.
  It compiles fine under mingw for me even after the changes.

Simon Brenner wrote:
Hi everyone,

maybe this is the appropriate list for this issue...

I found that in console/shell.c in function "spawn_linphonec" no use
is made of
the user-given
arguments (char *argv[]). At least this seems to be true for the #else
part of
this "#ifndef WIN32"
paragraph. In the linux paragraph the user arguments are forwarded to
the new
process.

Am I right??

Greetings,
-Simon.




Julian Krien wrote:
> Hello,
>
> i am wondering if it is possible to initialize linphonec daemon in
video
> mode (-V) via linphonecsh.
> I am running linphone 3.3.1 on Windows 7.
>
> help for linphonecsh tells me that arguments for linephonec should
> follow init action, but it seems argument -V has no effect.
>
> ==================================
> Usage:
> linphonecsh <action> [arguments]
> where action is one of
>         init            : spawn a linphonec daemon (first step to make
> other actions)
>                         followed by the arguments sent to linphonec
> ==================================
>
> i tried "linphonecsh init -V" , but i am only able to make audio
calls.
>
> thanks in advance.
>
> Julian





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]