Re: [Linphone-developers] nat traversal

[strk]

Ok, I found out and committed a patch to clean up 
the interface so it results more intuitive (at least
for me).

To be noted that 'nat <address>' and 'stun <address>'
won't change the firewall setting automatically now.
Still, you'll get a nice message telling you to use
'firewall' for that (if needed).

--strk;

On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 04:28:43PM +0200, strk wrote:
> I'm trying to avoid stun as a whole to see if I can get
> linphone to work. But I see (with the command-line tool)
> that the 'nat' command always says that nat is unused,
> even if 'use_nat' is set to 1 in the .linphonerc file.
> 
> Browseing the source code, I see that there's no 'use_nat'
> configuration string anymore, can anyone confirm ?
> 
> Is firewall_policy ever set to LINPHONE_POLICY_USE_NAT_ADDRESS ?
> Where ?
> 
> TIA
> 
> --strk;
> 
> On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 12:56:27AM +0200, strk wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Simon Morlat wrote:
> > > Hi strk,
> > > 
> > > Which version ?
> > 
> > HEAD
> > 
> > > Maybe the stun response takes too long to get back, thus linphone decides 
> > > to 
> > > send the register with the local address.
> > 
> > mmm.. I'm not even sure a stun request is sent.
> > Should I see it in the log file ?
> > 
> > --strk;
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linphone-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers
> 
> -- 
> 
>  ()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
>  /\   Keep it simple! 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers

-- 

 ()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 /\   Keep it simple!