Re: [Linphone-developers] nat traversal

[strk]

I'm trying to avoid stun as a whole to see if I can get
linphone to work. But I see (with the command-line tool)
that the 'nat' command always says that nat is unused,
even if 'use_nat' is set to 1 in the .linphonerc file.

Browseing the source code, I see that there's no 'use_nat'
configuration string anymore, can anyone confirm ?

Is firewall_policy ever set to LINPHONE_POLICY_USE_NAT_ADDRESS ?
Where ?

TIA

--strk;

On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 12:56:27AM +0200, strk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Simon Morlat wrote:
> > Hi strk,
> > 
> > Which version ?
> 
> HEAD
> 
> > Maybe the stun response takes too long to get back, thus linphone decides 
> > to 
> > send the register with the local address.
> 
> mmm.. I'm not even sure a stun request is sent.
> Should I see it in the log file ?
> 
> --strk;
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linphone-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/linphone-developers

-- 

 ()   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 /\   Keep it simple!