Re: [Linphone-developers] g_warning vs. vtable.display_warning

[strk]

Having done some more tests I'm convinced linphone core
should use its own warning/message/error functions.

In this way use of the functions set in the virtual
table can be triggered by both availability of them
(!=NULL) and possibly other settings (verbosity level?).

--strk;

On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 02:43:15AM +0100, strk wrote:
> linphonecore.c contains many invokations of g_warning(msg).
> I don't get those messages from the command line interface,
> and I'm not sure the GUI does in any way.
> 
> Would it be correct to substitute all g_warning() occurrences
> with LinephoneCore.vtable.display_warning() instead ?
> 
> There are already two uses of it.
> One is to warn about UDP port being in use
> and the other about invalid sip address.
> 
> Note that the second one checks for the vtable entry
> to be non-null, while the first doesn't. What would
> the correct way be ?
> 
> --strk;