lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cannot pass number variable to \markup.


From: Jean Abou Samra
Subject: Re: Cannot pass number variable to \markup.
Date: Mon, 08 May 2023 18:19:14 +0200
User-agent: Evolution 3.48.1 (3.48.1-1.fc38)

Le lundi 08 mai 2023 à 11:27 -0400, dfro a écrit :
Jean,
Thank you, for catching my omission of the CC to lilypond-user@gnu.org. I intended to reply to the group.

The use of variables for the \paper block makes more sense to me. However, I see that sometimes the numbers have no "#" before them, and sometimes they do as with:
inst-name-indent = #4.8
...and sometimes they do not, as with:
left-margin-title-page = 45
Also, setting true and false values use "##", as with:
ragged-last-setting = ##f

I am still not comprehending why the "#" is used sometimes and sometimes not. I am trying to grasp the nuances of how the lilypond language and the scheme language translate to each other.

Somewhere, in the documentation it talks about lilypond using the "#" to translate values into scheme language. Leaving off the "#" with numbers seems to break this rule.



inst-name-indent = 4.8

and

inst-name-indent = #4.8

are equivalent. LilyPond offers the first as syntactic sugar for the second. When it sees a number, it interprets it as number, like the Scheme interpreter behind # would have done. The exception is markup mode.

There is no such syntactic sugar for booleans, so you have to use an initial # to switch to Scheme mode. The second # is part of the syntax of booleans in Scheme (#t and #f, or #true and #false).


I also have a question about modes. Is normal mode where you input data outside a music block or without stating a mode explicitly, as with "\include "..."? I do not see it mentioned in "Notation Reference Manual, 3.1 Input modes". 


What I called “normal mode” is what the manual calls “note mode”.



Thank you, for the clear explanation of why \paper must be used for a "set-..." variable outside the main \paper block. That makes sense to me now.

I hope this is not too far off topic, but your "42 is the answer" reference led me to find this interesting article that is way over my head:https://news.mit.edu/2019/answer-life-universe-and-everything-sum-three-cubes-mathematics-0910.


Interesting, thanks for the link!


Best,
Jean


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]