[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bare time signature rendering difference
From: |
Werner LEMBERG |
Subject: |
Re: bare time signature rendering difference |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2023 06:11:58 +0000 (UTC) |
> I seem to have some sort of platform difference between my desktop
> and laptop computers. I'm rendering a bare time signature and tempo
> in a LaTeX table using lyluatex.
>
> The snippet: [...]
>
> {
> \new RhythmicStaff \with {\remove "Staff_symbol_engraver"}
> { \time 6/8 \numericTimeSignature \tempo 4=120 }
> }
>
> [...] fails to render any output:
>
> Module lyluatex Warning: The score doesn't contain any music:
> (lyluatex) this will probably cause bad output
>
> Is this properly formatted code?
Apparently your two computers use different LilyPond versions: recent
versions complain with
```
Warning: skipping zero-duration score
Warning: to suppress this, consider adding a spacer rest
```
If you do what the warning suggests, the snippet compiles again:
```
\new RhythmicStaff \with {\remove "Staff_symbol_engraver"}
{ \time 6/8 \numericTimeSignature \tempo 4=120 s }
```
Werner