[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Dec 2021 19:21:37 -0500 |
Hi Lukas,
> Maybe I'm going too far in my belief that "standard tasks best should not
> require # characters and scheme"
The limit does not exist. ;)
> but shouldn't we provide a LilyPond syntax interface for this?
Yes.
Do you know Harm's work in this direction?
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2019-09/txtoVtTEvm7jG.txt
Cheers,
Kieren.
- Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, Ahanu Banerjee, 2021/12/12
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/12/12
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2021/12/12
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, Jean Abou Samra, 2021/12/12
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, David Kastrup, 2021/12/12
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, Aaron Hill, 2021/12/12
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, David Kastrup, 2021/12/12
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, Aaron Hill, 2021/12/12
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2021/12/13
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, David Kastrup, 2021/12/13
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2021/12/13
- Re: Crescendo after custom dynamic marking, Werner LEMBERG, 2021/12/13