|
From: | Knute Snortum |
Subject: | Shortening eighth note beamed stems and other typesetting questions |
Date: | Tue, 4 May 2021 08:26:50 -0700 |
Hi, everyone. This will probably be a long post. I hope you will bear with me. I have two questions: one as experts in LilyPond and one that just has to do with typesetting, but they are related. First, I am trying to shorten the stems of beamed eighth notes. I found that Stem.details.beamed-lengths could do that, but it seems to have minimums that it won't go past. Consider this snippet: %%% Start \version "2.22.1" \relative { \override Stem.details.beamed-lengths = #'(2) c''8 c c c \override Stem.details.beamed-lengths = #'(3) c b a g | \override Stem.details.beamed-lengths = #'(3) c a f d } %%% End I can't get the repeated "c" eighth notes lower than 2 or the descending eighth notes lower than 3. Is there a way to get past these minimums? Or am I doing something wrong? Now the typesetting question: I have a piano piece that has several voices and there is a run of descending eighth notes inside of other voices that gets really cramped. Attached is a screenshot of how some older editions dealt with it (old-edition-solution.png). It requires shortening the eighth note beam down to almost nothing. Here is how the two measures look without any intervention (eighth-note-stems-without-intervention.ly produces lilypond-solution.png). It's an interesting solution, but I don't think it will work. And here is my solution (eighth-note-stems-my-solution.ly produces my-solution.png). Is it readable? Should I try to make it look like the old edition? If so, how? Thanks for reading this to the end. -- Knute Snortum
old-edition-solution.png
Description: PNG image
eighth-note-stems-without-intervention.ly
Description: Text Data
lilypond-solution.png
Description: PNG image
eighth-note-stems-my-solution.ly
Description: Text Data
my-solution.png
Description: PNG image
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |