[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Markup in scheme
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Markup in scheme |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Oct 2020 19:47:27 +0100 |
Am Sa., 31. Okt. 2020 um 16:30 Uhr schrieb John Schlomann
<jschlomann@wideopenwest.com>:
>
> In the following snippet, the first markup works fine. The second gives no
> errors, but outputs nothing.
>
>
>
> Why does the scheme version not work?
>
>
>
> \version "2.20.0"
>
> \markup{"First markup"}
>
> #(markup #:line (#:simple "Second markup"))
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
>
To have LilyPond do something with #(markup ...) you need to explain
to LilyPond _what_ to do with it".
Martin's example embeds it in a music expression. -> Initiate a TextScript-grob
You can store and call it like:
foo = #(markup #:line (#:simple "Second markup"))
\foo
It is called at top level. -> Create top level text
Directly and on top level you could do:
$(markup #:line (#:simple "Second markup"))
Directly evaluate the expression (here at top level). -> Create top level text
HTH,
Harm