[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Maybe a bug with slurs
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Maybe a bug with slurs |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Jun 2020 13:51:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Павел <budanov.pavel@gmail.com> writes:
> 07.06.2020 14:16, Павел пишет:
>> Thank you for deep explanation!
>>
>> Yes, this is complicated way but it can be useful in some cases.
>>
>> 07.06.2020 12:25, David Kastrup пишет:
>>> Павел <budanov.pavel@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> See these two examples. They are almost same except angle brackets. In
>>>> first example slur behaves correctly, but in second does not.
>>>>
>>>> \version "2.20.0"
>>>> {
>>>> \new Voice = "first" { g'8 f'( }
>>>> \context Voice = "first" << <e')>4 <b b'> >>
>>>> \new Voice = "second" { g'8 f'( }
>>>> \context Voice = "second" << e'4) <b b'> >>
>>>> }
>>> I disagree with that assessment. Yours is just a complicated way of
>>> writing
>>>
>>> \version "2.20.0"
>>> {
>>> \new Voice = "first" { g'8 f'( <e') b b'>4 }
>>> \new Voice = "second" { g'8 f'( <e' b b'>4) }
>>> }
>>>
>>> << >> places constructs in parallel, here into the same Voice. The
>>> first line uses an in-chord slur ending which is drawn to a specific
>>> note head, the second line uses a per-Voice slur ending which is drawn
>>> to the whole chord. e'4) is essentially the same as <e'>4) .
>>>
> Small clause: you said "e'4) is essentially the same as <e'>4)". But
> according to your explanation it is essentially the different as
> <e'>4), but in most practical cases they behave same.
>
While I am unsure that I guess your meaning correctly from this somewhat
jumbled sentence, I repeat: e'4) is essentially the same as <e'>4) which
is different from <e')>4
--
David Kastrup