[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fingering inside staff
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Fingering inside staff |
Date: |
Sat, 30 May 2020 13:18:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Thomas Morley <thomasmorley65@gmail.com> writes:
> Alas, I've not the time and energy to write a patch myself and fight
> my way through the new GitLab process.
git push -o merge_request.create -o merge_request.title="My patch" -o
merge_request.remove_source_branch origin HEAD:my-proposed-branch-name
The push message gives you a HTTP link to your newly created merge
request. You can follow the progress there.
> I have to admit I have skipped most of GitLab discussions and hints.
> This will ofcourse give me some problems once my time allows to
> participate more activ again.
> Right now I'm too tired ...
You don't need something like git-cl: the basic setup is really quite
simple. The most efficient way to organise continuous ongoing work is
something we are still figuring out, but you are talking about entry
hurdles here. Those are not really high.
--
David Kastrup
- Fingering inside staff, Simone Capretti, 2020/05/29
- Re: Fingering inside staff, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2020/05/29
- Re: Fingering inside staff, Valentin Villenave, 2020/05/29
- Re: Fingering inside staff, Thomas Morley, 2020/05/29
- Re: Fingering inside staff, Valentin Villenave, 2020/05/30
- Re: Fingering inside staff, Valentin Villenave, 2020/05/30
- Re: Fingering inside staff, Thomas Morley, 2020/05/30
- Re: Fingering inside staff,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Fingering inside staff, Thomas Morley, 2020/05/30
- Re: Fingering inside staff, Valentin Villenave, 2020/05/30
Re: Fingering inside staff, Jamie Beardslee, 2020/05/29