[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent
From: |
David Wright |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent |
Date: |
Wed, 13 May 2020 09:31:44 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Wed 13 May 2020 at 14:59:10 (+0100), Paul McKay wrote:
> If I'm writing music in F, then I suggest that I be able to use *bF* as a
> pitch instead of *bf*. The *F* would indicate that all subsequent *b*s
> would be flattened until one is encountered with a different accidental or
> until the end of the current music expression. It should have the same
> scope as \stemUp or similar.
The problem with that is that to find out what any particular "b"
represents, you have to search backwards, note-by-note, looking for
any such modification that might have been made to a "b" earlier.
Any copy-and-paste manipulations become potential nightmares.
Cheers,
David.
- Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent, Paul McKay, 2020/05/13
- Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent,
David Wright <=
- Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent, Valentin Villenave, 2020/05/13
- Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent, David Kastrup, 2020/05/13
- Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent, antlists, 2020/05/13
- Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent, David Nalesnik, 2020/05/13
- Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent, David Wright, 2020/05/13
- Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent, Hans Ã…berg, 2020/05/14
- Re: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent, David Wright, 2020/05/14
- RE: Suggestion to make sharps and flats persistent, Mark Stephen Mrotek, 2020/05/14