Re: Unmerged accidentals

[Leo Correia de Verdier]

Thanks!

While not what I was expecting, it works well for me. (I was expecting them to 
have been merged into a single grob, not to be printed on top of eachother). If 
anyone was curious about it, my rather more aggressive hack was:
%%%%%%%%%
\version "2.19.84"
 { <f'! fis'> <\tweak Accidental.alteration #1/2 fih' fis'> }
%%%%%%%%%

> 25 feb. 2020 kl. 16:25 skrev Pierre Perol-Schneider <address@hidden>:
> 
> Hi Leo,
> Since I don't know how you made it, here's what I'd do:
> 
> \version "2.19.84"
> { <f'! fis'> <fis' \tweak Accidental.X-offset #1.2 fis'> }
> %% or
> { <fis' f'!> <fis'! \tweak Accidental.X-offset #1.2 fis'!> }
> 
> So also a hack.
> Cheers, 
> Pierre
> 
> Le mar. 25 févr. 2020 à 14:46, Leo Correia de Verdier <address@hidden> a 
> écrit :
> Dear list!
> 
> Is there a neat way to achieve two (unmerged) accidentals of the same type in 
> front of an unison? I can produce the attached output by means of some 
> hacking, but am wondering if there is a way of preventing them being merged 
> in the first place.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> /Leo