On 2020-02-11 8:05 am, Paolo Prete wrote:
> thanks to the _great_ support of Aaron and Harm, I implemented this new
> version of the outside-staff spacing method I proposed some days ago.
I am getting quite a few errors and warnings compiling the code pasted
in the email. I wonder if the email process has mangled something. It
might be worth attaching the original source, so that formatting can be
preserved.
Here's an attachment of a new version, with your last suggestions.
I left unchanged the sorting method (I have to investigate better what you said), but I wonder, meanwhile, if
is it possible to add a hairpin to the dynamic below the staff ( mf < ff ) with all the positions preserved.
Thanks!
P