AW: "Quote" Chord Track in another Staff

[sir.teddy.the.first]

Yes, thank you.
I tried to do it that way but I always forget the "\etc" so I got an error 
message.

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Thomas Morley <address@hidden>
> Gesendet: Samstag, 8. Februar 2020 14:30
> An: address@hidden
> Cc: lilypond-user <address@hidden>
> Betreff: Re: "Quote" Chord Track in another Staff
> 
> Am Sa., 8. Feb. 2020 um 14:18 Uhr schrieb <address@hidden>:
> >
> > If I've understood everything you said correctly, I should have now made all
> the necessary changes:
> 
> Well, not all changes were _necessary_, p.e. using 'parser location'
> in music-functions still works. Superfluous, though.
> 
> >
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> > \version "2.19.83"
> >
> > quoteChord = #(define-music-function
> >     (staffName music)
> >     (string? ly:music?)
> >
> >     #{
> >       \context ChordNames = #(string-append staffName "-chords")
> >         \quoteDuring "chrds" {
> >           \context Staff = $staffName { $music }
> >         }
> >     #}
> > )
> 
> You could do
> quoteChordSecond = \quoteChord "second" \etc
> 
> >
> > chordTrack = \chordmode {
> >   \repeat unfold 2 {
> >     c1 d e f |
> >   }
> > }
> >
> > %% make 'chordTrack' quotable
> > \addQuote "chrds" { \chordTrack }
> >
> > notes = \relative c' {
> >   \repeat unfold 8 {
> >     c4 d e f |
> >   }
> > }
> >
> > otherNotes = \relative c' {
> 
> Then here:
>   c1 d e f g a \quoteChordSecond { b } c
> 
> >   c1 d e f g a \quoteChord "second" { b } c }
> >
> > \score {
> >   <<
> >   \new ChordNames \chordTrack
> >   \new Staff \notes
> >   %% initiate a ChordNames-context which may be filled form 'otherNotes'
> >   \new ChordNames = "second-chords" { #(skip-of-length otherNotes) }
> >   \new Staff = "second" \otherNotes
> >   >>
> > }
> > %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
> >
> > Now I should not encounter any problems as long as I always name the
> ChordNames corresponding the staff, "(name-of-the-staff)-chords".
> > Is there a way to store ' \quoteChord "second" ' in a variable so I only 
> > have
> to define it once per staff?
> > That would shorten it even further.
> 
> Cheers,
>   Harm