[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Oct 2019 23:10:35 +0100 |
> On 30 Oct 2019, at 23:05, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Hans Åberg <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> The snippets should be LGPL for being includable under other licenses,
>> I believe, because the processed part remains in the output, and thus
>> copyrightable. Thus, they play the same role as the Bison skeleton
>> file and GCC libraries.
>
> LSR snippets are public domain already.
So then this is not an issue, but public domain means that it can be exploited
in ways you may not approve of, therefore LGPL would be better. But I am not an
expert on such matters.
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, (continued)
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Henning Hraban Ramm, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Karsten Reincke, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Carl Sorensen, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Hans Åberg, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Carl Sorensen, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Hans Åberg, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Carl Sorensen, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Hans Åberg, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Hans Åberg, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, David Kastrup, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, David Kastrup, 2019/10/30
- Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Hans Åberg, 2019/10/30
Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Urs Liska, 2019/10/29
Re: LilyPond, LilyPond snippets and the GPL, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2019/10/29