[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Puzzled about r1 issue in 3/4 time
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Puzzled about r1 issue in 3/4 time |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Oct 2019 23:44:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Gerdau <address@hidden> writes:
>>>Lilypond is right, r1 is 4 beats long. What you probably want is
>>>r1*3/4 or most likely (and better) R1*3/4 instead of r1.
>
>> More like R2.
>
> What is the difference between R2. and R1*3/4 apart from the obvious
> difference in the source file?
Probably none. I think that R only looks at the actual time spent and
doesn't care just how the time is spent. But if the next note is, say,
c' then a default duration of 2. and a default duration of 1*3/4 will
make it look different.
--
David Kastrup