Re: Horizontal Slurs (was Re: (no subject))

[Urs Liska]

Hi Aaron,

thank you for looking into it. I think I'll get along with the suggestion in 
the current score, but I'll also file a bug report because I think this should 
not happen in the first place, and the notation is not terribly excentrly ...

Best
Urs

24. September 2019 19:23, "Aaron Hill" <address@hidden> schrieb:

> On 2019-09-24 9:35 am, Urs Liska wrote:
> 
>> Is there any reason why the slrus in the attached example come out the
>> way they do (i.e. so horizontal, with the left edge being so far away
>> from the notehead)?
> 
> Seems to be a combination of slurring identical pitches and the articulation 
> on the one note. If
> you remove the staccato, the slur sits reasonably close. If you change either 
> pitch, then the slur
> behaves more normally.
> 
> %%%%
> \version "2.19.83"
> 
> { a'8._( a'16_.) \bar "||"
> a'8._( a'16) b'8._( a'16_.) a'8._( b'16_.) }
> %%%%
> 
>> What would be the best way to deal with that? Of course I could \shape
>> them individually, but there's a lot of them in the scores, so I'd
>> prefer a *setting* to be applied.
> 
> Adjusting edge-attraction-factor seems to help, but be careful with too high 
> a value as it collides
> with the articulation:
> 
> %%%%
> \version "2.19.83"
> 
> { \once \override Slur.details.edge-attraction-factor = #38
> a'8._( a'16_.)
> \once \override Slur.details.edge-attraction-factor = #48
> a'8._( a'16_.)
> \once \override Slur.details.edge-attraction-factor = #58
> a'8._( a'16_.) }
> %%%%
> 
> -- Aaron Hill
> _______________________________________________
> lilypond-user mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user