[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Automatic beaming with rest
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Automatic beaming with rest |
Date: |
Tue, 2 Apr 2019 11:17:36 -0400 |
Hi there,
> I don't think it's quite that simple as rests that begin or end beam groups
> wouldn't have beams over them, only ones in the middle.
Not strictly true: in modern scores, the beam could easily extend over those
rests (especially if stemlets are used). We just need to give the user
options/parameters to determine how to handle those cases.
In any case, I think working out the logic behind an autobeam-over-rest
functionality that easily satisfies the vast majority of people’s needs isn’t
nearly as difficult as perhaps some people think.
Cheers,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, (continued)
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Carl Sorensen, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, David Kastrup, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Kieren MacMillan, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Br. Samuel Springuel, 2019/04/02
- Re: Automatic beaming with rest,
Kieren MacMillan <=
Re: Automatic beaming with rest, Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2019/04/02