[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: counter for voltas with no alternative endings?
From: |
Stig Brautaset |
Subject: |
Re: counter for voltas with no alternative endings? |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2019 07:41:58 +0000 |
Aaron Hill <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2019-02-18 9:28 pm, Federico Bruni wrote:
>> I see. AFAIK it's not standard notation (I mean, I would interpret it
>> as the 8th volta of a missing repeat section), but if that's what you
>> want... :-)
[...]
> I would recommend using simple markup either at the beginning or end of
> the repeated section with the clear instruction to repeat the
> appropriate number of times. This avoids anything potentially
> non-standard.
Thank you both for that. I don't want to cause confusion, so I'll
rethink my approach here.
> Otherwise, you could just duplicate the last measure as if it were an
> alternate, and then the normal volta brackets should work. It is
> certainly not that uncommon to see volta sections with duplicated
> measures across alternates. Sometimes one does it to provide more
> context across a line break or page turn.
This sounds like a sensible approach. Thank you!
Stig