Should the LilyPond website mention financial support for contributors?

[Karlin High]

From recent thread:

<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2018-11/msg00148.html>

I was following the LilyPond community for quite a while before 
realizing that financially supporting developers was a thing. The most 
obvious pages on the website, "Sponsoring" and "Help us" say nothing 
about it:

<http://lilypond.org/sponsoring.html>

Lots of other websites have a "tip jar" for the site operator. How about 
putting up some PayPal.Me links...

<https://www.paypal.com/us/smarthelp/article/what-is-paypal.me-faq3025>

...for David Kastrup, Urs Liska, or other major contributors? Assuming 
the contributors are open to the idea, and it fits with the way the 
contributor and the community see their role in the project.

I guess project-level donations would also be possible, but then there's 
the whole issue of managing the funds, and maybe non-profit organization 
compliance if using GNU's donation systems. Giving directly to 
contributors seems simpler.

I'm thinking such website changes would go through code review just like 
anything else, giving the LilyPond community a chance to discuss what 
contributors would get listed for financial support.
--
Karlin High
Missouri, USA