[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Grace notes & Co, style question
From: |
Jacques Menu Muzhic |
Subject: |
Re: Grace notes & Co, style question |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Jan 2018 18:41:02 +0100 |
BTW, this could be added to the LPNR it seems.
JM
> Le 24 janv. 2018 à 07:21, Jacques Menu Muzhic <address@hidden> a écrit :
>
> Hello Joram,
>
> Thanks for the clarification!
>
> JM
>
>> Le 23 janv. 2018 à 21:42, Noeck <address@hidden> a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> in your 8 bars, you have only 4 different outcomes of your 8 different
>> inputs, combinations of (slashed/unslashed) and (slurred/unslurred). I
>> would just recommend to use the relevant command instead of adding extra
>> slurs to the input, i.e. to use your first line:
>>
>> 1. no slash, no slur: \grace
>> 2. slash and slur: \acciaccatura
>> 3. slash but no slur: \slashedGrace
>> 4. no slash but slur: \appoggiatura
>>
>> But that recommendation is just because it seems cleaner to me because
>> it does not duplicate things (slurs).
>>
>> At least the duplication does not seem to have side effects, there are
>> no double slurs or so. I looked at the source code and the slurred
>> variants have a 'SlurEvent ... START and ... STOP around them. So I
>> guess if you add a slur, it does not change anything as the slur is
>> alread "activated". But the developers might correct me.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Joram
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> lilypond-user mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
>