[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \version statement, etc.
From: |
Malte Meyn |
Subject: |
Re: \version statement, etc. |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Oct 2017 16:15:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 |
Am 17.10.2017 um 08:31 schrieb Paul Scott:
I just downloaded and installed 2.19.80 (what happened to 2.19.66 through
2.19.79?)
2.19.80 is the first pre-release for 2.20; the xx in 2.19.xx approaching
99 stands for “we’ll be there soon”.
2.19.80 doesn't seem to see my version statements:
That’s intended: https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/5180/
For example, if you had
\include "english.ly"
but no version statement in your main file, LilyPond didn’t output a
warning because it sees a version statement in the included file.
It’s always good to have a version statement in each file; this is why
it was changed.
- \version statement, etc., Paul Scott, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., Simon Albrecht, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc.,
Malte Meyn <=
- Re: \version statement, etc., Phil Holmes, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., David Kastrup, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., Paul Scott, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., David Kastrup, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., Paul Scott, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., David Kastrup, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., Paul Scott, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., David Kastrup, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., Paul Scott, 2017/10/17
- Re: \version statement, etc., David Kastrup, 2017/10/17