[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \justify & break
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: \justify & break |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Oct 2017 10:09:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Gianmaria Lari <address@hidden> writes:
> On 5 October 2017 at 01:05, Thomas Morley <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> Well, you could do:
>>
>> \markup {
>> \column {
>> \line \bold \smallCaps { Note }
>> \justify-string
>> #"L'articolazione d'elezione per lo staccato รจ quella del braccio, o
>> nel
>> caso di parti rapide, del polso. \n
>> Nello staccato, braccio, mano e dita sono un tutt'uno ed agiscono in
>> modo
>> compatto senza scomporsi e senza articolazioni intermedie."
>> }
>> }
>>
>> Ofcourse \n _is_ scheme-syntax ;)
>>
>
> Uhmm... in that case I prefer to use two consecutive \justify. But \n is
> good to know. I will keep it in my arsenal :)
>
> By the way why \justify-string use the scheme syntax and it is not a first
> class citizen of lilypond language?
Huh? Can you spell out anything that you would expect from a "first
class citizen of LilyPond language" that does not work with
\justify-string ?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: \justify & break, (continued)
- Re: \justify & break, Malte Meyn, 2017/10/04
- Re: \justify & break, Gianmaria Lari, 2017/10/04
- Re: \justify & break, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/04
- Re: \justify & break, Gianmaria Lari, 2017/10/05
- Re: \justify & break, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/05
- Re: \justify & break, Gianmaria Lari, 2017/10/05
- Re: \justify & break, Thomas Morley, 2017/10/05
- Re: \justify & break, Gianmaria Lari, 2017/10/05
- Re: \justify & break, David Kastrup, 2017/10/05
- Re: \justify & break, Gianmaria Lari, 2017/10/05
- Re: \justify & break,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: \justify & break, Gianmaria Lari, 2017/10/05
Re: \justify & break, Marc Hohl, 2017/10/05