[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: \mark and slur
From: |
Noeck |
Subject: |
Re: \mark and slur |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 22:08:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1 |
Hi,
> Note or chord or rest or skip or bass figure or cluster note or lyrics
> or multimeasure rest. Something like that.
:)
> Slur or phrasing slur or absolute dynamic or annote output or arpeggio
> or articulation or beam or beam forbid or bendafter or crescendo or
> decrescendo or episema or, well, the alphabet is long yet.
:) Well that's what I feared.
> SlurEvent has the advantage that it is a property of the music
> expression one can get and print comparatively easy.
I expected something like that. So it would be an easy and helpful
improvement of the message. One could also automatically remove the
"Event" part. But there's not much gain.
Joram
- Re: \mark and slur, (continued)
- Re: \mark and slur, Rutger Hofman, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Rutger Hofman, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Noeck, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur,
Noeck <=
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/14
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, Thomas Morley, 2017/09/16
- Re: \mark and slur, David Kastrup, 2017/09/16