Hello David,
Thanks for the explanations!
I’ll become a super-smart new-fangled composer only next year probably, so I’ll go along your advice for the time being...
JM
Menu Jacques <address@hidden> writes:Hello folks,
The two tuplets below are visually different, but what’s the musical difference, and how should a performer play that?
\version "2.19.55"
\relative c' { \times 2/4 { e4 f4 g4 a4 } \times 1/4 { b4 c4 c4 b4 } }
The two tuplets [above] are visually different, but what’s the musical difference, and how should a performer play that?
That's just bad notation. Either, by the way. Factors of 2/4 and 1/4do not make sense with \times. They might with \scaleDurations (whichdoes not attach tuplet numbers) in polyrhythmical situations, but notwith a change in mid-sequence.If you are a super-smart new-fangled composer and really really mean it,you might want to consider explicit "2:4" and "1:4" tuplet numbers:there is a special tuplet number formatter override for that (too lazyto look it up right now). Which is also helpful for distinguishing 7:4and 7:8 (heptuplets of either persuasion can be found in scores).In that manner, the notation becomes unambiguous again. It doesn'tbecome a good idea by that, but at least one can see what is desiredfrom the executioner.-- David Kastrup
|