[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: New LilyPond website
From: |
Gerdau, Michael |
Subject: |
Re: New LilyPond website |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Nov 2016 14:18:10 +0100 (CET) |
> You make the argument of readability, and I counter it with this:
> https://www.google.com/amp/www.webdesignerdepot.com/2013/03/serif-vs-sans-the-final-battle/amp/?client=ms-android-google
I paraphrase that article (and shorten it thereby ever so slightly ;) )
Essentially on modern high DPI screens use Serif while on old low DPI screens
Sans seems better.
Corollar:
On the long run we should use Serif then.
As a sidenote:
I consider the claimed 1000 dpi for printed work a myth. In reality most of the
time they are in the range of 200-400 (given distortion due to paper quality
etc.). Even 600 dpi laser printer don't actually deliver that resolution on
paper.
Kind regards,
Michael
--
Michael Gerdau email: address@hidden
GPG-keys available on request or at public keyserver
- Re: New LilyPond website, (continued)
- Re: New LilyPond website, Shane Brandes, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, Karlin High, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, David Kastrup, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, Noeck, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website,
Gerdau, Michael <=
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, John Roper, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, Shane Brandes, 2016/11/30
- Re: New LilyPond website, Carl Sorensen, 2016/11/30
RE: New LilyPond website, Andrew Bernard, 2016/11/29