[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Skyfonts
From: |
Andrew Bernard |
Subject: |
RE: Skyfonts |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:24:48 +1100 |
Hi Matthew,
The Monotype Library Subscription has a lot of benefits for a designer, but it
is a rental service, which is the explanation for the architecture. It's not
malware by any means. I think it is fair to protect the IP rights of type
designers.
I am just happy to have access to thousands of exceptionally high quality font
designs for my publishing and design work.
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, 7 November 2016 11:19 PM
To: Simon Albrecht <address@hidden>
Cc: Andrew Bernard <address@hidden>; address@hidden
Subject: Re: Skyfonts
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Simon Albrecht wrote:
> On 07.11.2016 12:31, address@hidden wrote:
> You might even say it was unethical by the provider of the font to not
> provide for use in free software like LilyPond…
...or to put encrypted files in a hidden location on someone's machine.
That's what malware does, and things that do it, are quacking like malware.
But my ethics aren't the question here.
--
Matthew Skala
address@hidden People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/
- Skyfonts, Andrew Bernard, 2016/11/07
- Re: Skyfonts, David Kastrup, 2016/11/07
- RE: Skyfonts, Andrew Bernard, 2016/11/07
- Re: Skyfonts, Alexander Kobel, 2016/11/07
- RE: Skyfonts, Andrew Bernard, 2016/11/07
- Re: Skyfonts, David Kastrup, 2016/11/07
- RE: Skyfonts, Andrew Bernard, 2016/11/07
- Re: Skyfonts, Alexander Kobel, 2016/11/07
- Re: Skyfonts, David Kastrup, 2016/11/07
Re: Skyfonts, SoundsFromSound, 2016/11/07