[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator
From: |
Hans Åberg |
Subject: |
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator |
Date: |
Sat, 5 Nov 2016 00:13:31 +0100 |
> On 5 Nov 2016, at 00:03, David Wright <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Mairi's Wedding is completely regular; it has five 8-bar
>>> sections, which happens to sum to 40:
>>
>> But they have to play it A B A B B, where each letter is a 8-bar section.
>
> For that original tune, that's the usual sequence. But why "But"?
> Lots of tunes are expanded by repeating an 8-bar phrase if they're
> shorter than the dance demands. The dancers couldn't care less so
> long as the music changes after the correct number of bars.
> The next tune (you need several if you're not going to bore people
> with eight times through) might be a tune that has a different
> length and structure. Then there are loads of 48-bar and 64-bar
> dances. None of this variation makes a dance irregular.
>
> There's a useful introduction at
> http://trillian.mit.edu/~jc/music/abc/Scotland/PlayingForSCD.html
It is an irregularity that has to be compensated for, as this your link. Tunes
with sections not a power of two occurs in Swedish folk music, for example this
polska after Höök Olle (in 3/4).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WGWpQVvjBrU
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, (continued)
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Tobin Chodos, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/03
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, Hans Åberg, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, David Wright, 2016/11/04
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator,
Hans Åberg <=
- Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03
Re: compound time signature with non duple denominator, mclaren, 2016/11/03