|
From: | Chris Yate |
Subject: | Re: Augmentation dots reg test |
Date: | Sat, 29 Oct 2016 20:42:04 +0100 |
The test case isn't ideal (maybe <a e> is better than <a e,>, but I think the dotted minim a needs an individual dot...
On 10/29/16 3:29 AM, "Chris Yate" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>What happens with your new code with overlapping, rather than stacked
>notes? E.g. << <f a b c>4. // <a e,>2. >> (untested).
>
>I think from previous test cases it may become difficult to understand
>which dots behind to which notes. IIRC there's an outstanding bug about
>horizontal positioning in this situation.
Here is the output of your test case. How would you like this to appear?
Thanks,
Carl
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |