[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question: Cross compilation
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Question: Cross compilation |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2016 10:04:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> writes:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Shann" <address@hidden>
> To: "David Kastrup" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "Lilypond-User Mailing List" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 27, 2016 8:38 AM
> Subject: Re: Question: Cross compilation
>>
>> and, more specifically, I would guess they are spent in creating the
>> documentation (as this involves running LilyPond on thousands on
>> examples). I say this because Denemo is built overnight for three
>> targets with (son of) GUB, and that involves not only building LilyPond
>> but also Gtk, Fluidsynth, PortAudio, PortMidi and quite a few other
>> packages. (But not the LilyPond documentation, which, out of idleness
>> with respect to setting it up, I always access online).
>>
>> Richard
>
> No - I can build the docs on that machine in 15 minutes. The day-long
> compile is building the toolset that Gub uses.
Aren't the docs rebuilt for every platform?
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, (continued)
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, Chris Yate, 2016/09/26
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, Chris Yate, 2016/09/26
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, David Kastrup, 2016/09/26
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, Richard Shann, 2016/09/27
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, Phil Holmes, 2016/09/27
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, Richard Shann, 2016/09/27
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, Phil Holmes, 2016/09/27
- Re: Question: Cross compilation,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, Phil Holmes, 2016/09/27
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2016/09/27
- Re: Question: Cross compilation, Chris Yate, 2016/09/27
Re: Question: Cross compilation, Chris Yate, 2016/09/27