[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10 |
Date: |
Sun, 11 Sep 2016 12:20:07 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Anders Eriksson <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2016-09-10 22:16, tisimst wrote:
>> Just thought I'd add my two cents. I'm using Windows 8 and I only see a small
>> speed increase between older versions and 2.19.47.
>>
>> Using:
>>
>> \repeat unfold 200 { \tuplet 5/4 { c'4 d' e' f' g' } }
>>
>> and compiling in "publish" mode (i.e., no point-and-click links) I get the
>> following results:
>>
>> 2.18.2 - 6.5 seconds
>> 2.19.36 - 2.7 seconds
>> 2.19.47 - 3.0 seconds
>>
>>
> I have now tested (with the same code) some versions of Lilypond on my
> Windows 10 Anniversary and found this:
> Version Seconds
> 2.18.2.1 6.7
> 2.19.17.1 7.0
> 2.19.27.1 4.0
> 2.19.37.1 4.5
> 2.19.40.1 4.2
> 2.19.42.1 4.7
> 2.19.43.1 29.8
> 2.19.44.1 27.9
> 2.19.46.1 28.2
> 2.19.47.1 28.0
>
> So the problem begins with 2.19.43.
I assume that this is due to changes in GUB or in the font defaults.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, (continued)
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Simon Albrecht, 2016/09/06
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Michael Rivers, 2016/09/08
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Anders Eriksson, 2016/09/08
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, tisimst, 2016/09/10
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Anders Eriksson, 2016/09/11
- Message not available
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Anders Eriksson, 2016/09/11
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Phil Holmes, 2016/09/14
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/09/14
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Anders Eriksson, 2016/09/14
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Michael Rivers, 2016/09/14
- Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10,
David Kastrup <=
Re: Version 2.18 vs.2.19 speed and W10, Michael Rivers, 2016/09/06