RE: header

[Mark Stephen Mrotek]

Simon,

Your explanation makes sense, if my score were different numbers in one
opus.
My score is two movements of the same opus.
I shall try your suggestion.
Thank you for your kind attention.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Simon Albrecht [mailto:address@hidden 
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 4:27 PM
To: Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden>; 'lilypond-user'
<address@hidden>
Subject: Re: header

On 13.07.2016 00:38, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
> Simon,
>
> Thank you for your reply and reference to the manual.
> It does seem to be rather complicated for my simple score.
> \header
> \include
> \include
> Why is the "opus" printed with both "includes"?

Because it seems to be designed for a situation where you print 'op. xxx No.
1' on the first piece and 'op. xxx No. 2' on the second. The simpler
solution would be to set the opus field in the first score and leave it
empty (or unset it: opus = ##f) in the second.

HTH, Simon

>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Simon Albrecht [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 3:28 PM
> To: Mark Stephen Mrotek <address@hidden>; 'lilypond-user'
> <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: header
>
> On 12.07.2016 23:15, Mark Stephen Mrotek wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> An outline of a two movement work (2.18.2)
>>
>> \header {
>>
>> Title = % title
>>
>> Composer = % composer
>>
>> Opus = % opus
>>
>> }
>>
>> \ include %here first movement
>>
>> \page break
>>
>> \include %here second movement
>>
>> Everything compiles as wanted, except the opus appears at the 
>> beginning of the second movement also.
>>
>> What should I adjust?
>>
> Redefine bookTitleMarkup and scoreTitleMarkup in \paper {}, so that 
> opus is referenced from the former, not the latter.
> <http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/custom-titles-he
> aders-
> and-footers#custom-layout-for-titles>
>
> Best, Simon
>