|
| From: | Simon Albrecht |
| Subject: | Re: hairpin length |
| Date: | Sat, 18 Jun 2016 17:37:42 +0200 |
On 18.06.2016 17:27, David Nalesnik wrote:
(I would propose that bound-padding be redefined as a pair in the code base. Broken-bound-padding, too. The latter is not replaced with a broken-bound-padding-pair in this code experiment, but that should be easily done.)
Well, it should be pretty easy to use number-or-pair?, shouldn’t it? That way you can use both as a matter of convenience.
Best, Simon
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |