[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Using strings and other types to return markup
|
From: |
Johan Vromans |
|
Subject: |
Re: Using strings and other types to return markup |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 May 2016 23:50:12 +0200 |
On Wed, 11 May 2016 17:58:52 +0100
"Phil Holmes" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Attached is my LilyPond approximation of that
> section of the madrigal.
Regarding the ye versus Þe -- it seems wrong to me to simulate the
appearance of a handwritten glyph (thorn, but looking like y) with the wrong
glyph.
This is a generic problem when typesetting hand-written texts. For example,
some people like to write a z with a tail ('long zett' IIRC). When
transcribing, should this be simulated with e.g. an ezh? Or just use a z
since that is the meaning of the glyph?
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, (continued)
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, Johan Vromans, 2016/05/11
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, Phil Holmes, 2016/05/11
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, Brian Barker, 2016/05/11
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, Andrew Bernard, 2016/05/11
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, Phil Holmes, 2016/05/11
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, Andrew Bernard, 2016/05/11
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, Phil Holmes, 2016/05/11
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, Christopher R. Maden, 2016/05/11
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup,
Johan Vromans <=
- Re: Using strings and other types to return markup, Phil Holmes, 2016/05/12
- [OT] Scribal abbreviations (Was: Re: Using strings and other types to return markup), Graham King, 2016/05/11
- Re: [OT] Scribal abbreviations (Was: Re: Using strings and other types to return markup), Andrew Bernard, 2016/05/11