Re: HELP: Trill line without 'tr' written before it

[Mike Solomon]

> On 16 Mar 2016, at 13:38, David Kastrup <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> Simon Albrecht <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> On 16.03.2016 11:42, Mike Solomon wrote:
>>> \once \override TrillSpanner #'bound-details #'left #'text = ##f % this is 
>>> how
>> 
>> IIUC this syntax is being disallowed at the moment and 2.20 will only
>> allow the (very convenient) dot-separated list syntax
>> \once\override TrillSpanner bound-details.left.text = ##f
> 
> All of the following will likely remain allowed for 2.20:
> 
> \once \override TrillSpanner.bound-details.left.text = ##f
> % recommended form as of 2.18 as it is simplest
> 
> \once \override TrillSpanner #'(bound-details left text) = ##f
> % recommended form as of 2.12, complementing the corresponding \revert
> % but rarely actually used.  Its non-use encouraged a lot
> % of non-working code in the manner of
> % \revert TrillSpanner #'bound-details #'left #'text
> 
> \once \override TrillSpanner bound-details.left.text = ##f
> % completely equivalent form using dotted list syntax.  Why bother?
> 
> A number of other more obscure variants will work equally well.  But the
> version written by Mike is slated to go.
> 

Ah, cool, good to know - I have a style sheet that dates from the Stone Age 
that I haven’t done convert-ly on.  I’ll run it now!
~Mike