Re: Spam u don't like

[David Kastrup]

"Peter Gentry" <address@hidden> writes:

> How did potential malware links get into the list, it hasn't happend
> before? If its not spam then the poster should be less cryptic
> or he won't get anyone interested.

Spam sent with a spoofed address from a list participant.

The headers indicate

Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 
4.71)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>) id 1abl63-0001w5-GC
        for address@hidden; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 03:28:30 -0500
Original-Received: from mbob.nabble.com ([162.253.133.15]:52587)
        by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
        (envelope-from <address@hidden>) id 1abl63-0001uG-8E
        for address@hidden; Fri, 04 Mar 2016 03:28:27 -0500
Original-Received: from msam.nabble.com (unknown [162.253.133.85])
        by mbob.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4078222658C
        for <address@hidden>; Fri,  4 Mar 2016 00:20:03 -0800 (PST)
X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: iOS iPhone or iPad
X-Received-From: 162.253.133.15

Which seems like an injection via Nabble.com.  Rather than a spoofed
mail address, this would rather look like a hacked account at
Nabble.com.  Much less likely, a hacked iPad (but what kind of
virus/worm would try going through a Nabble account next?).

Marc?  Any ideas?

-- 
David Kastrup