[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming
From: |
Urs Liska |
Subject: |
Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jan 2016 01:46:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 |
Am 15.01.2016 um 01:19 schrieb Simon Albrecht:
> On 15.01.2016 01:09, Urs Liska wrote:
>> F) is interesting as it*only* has strictBeatBeaming set.
>> There is no subdivision in the middle of the beam (7-8) because
>> subdivideBeams is not set. However, the beamlets at stems 2 and 10 force
>> the subdivisions 2-3 and 9-10, each resulting in the beam count
>> corresponding to the metrical value of the right stem.
>
> This looks odd, since there is such a large gap at 2–3. By mere
> intuition, I’d say there should be three beams at this position.
I think it would be rather trivial to do now. But I think the current
solution is what people suggested.
With music with such short notes (i.e. high number of beams) anything
looks quite strange, and I wouldn't want to engrave *anything* without
subdivideBeams on.
Urs
>
> Yours, Simon
- Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Urs Liska, 2016/01/13
- Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Urs Liska, 2016/01/13
- Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/01/13
- Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/13
- Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Pierre Perol-Schneider, 2016/01/13
- Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/01/15
- Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Urs Liska, 2016/01/15
- Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Urs Liska, 2016/01/15
- Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Urs Liska, 2016/01/15
- Re: Behavior of non-flag side with strictBeatBeaming, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/01/16