[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:00:37 -0500 |
Hi Urs,
> Well, default behaviour is to break the beam at all rests here (see attached).
ew
> But if the user manually enters the beam enclosing the rest there should
> be *something*.
+1
> What would be nice too […] is adding a stemlet,
> but without implicitly adding beamlets.
Yes.
n.b. Your previous email [with the example which included stemlets] and this
one taken together confirm that I prefer (as Gould does) stemlets in
high-beam-count situations.
Best regards,
Kieren.
________________________________
Kieren MacMillan, composer
‣ website: www.kierenmacmillan.info
‣ email: address@hidden
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, (continued)
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Mark Knoop, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Kieren MacMillan, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Werner LEMBERG, 2016/01/12
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Mark Knoop, 2016/01/13
- Re: Beaming over a rest before a subdivision, Urs Liska, 2016/01/13