lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Jianpu Notation


From: MING TSANG
Subject: Re: Jianpu Notation
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 12:05:08 +0000 (UTC)

David:   Thank you for started the jianpu notation.  I also love it to call "JianpuStaff".
Paul:  Thank you for the time and patience and effort that make jianpu notation possible.
Carl: Thank you suggestion to add to lilypond core. Thank you for pointing out a1soft software program. I will have a look. I still love jianpu notation in lilypond. I am very satisfied now - that my wish came true since lily v2.12

Immanuel,
Ming Tsang



On Thursday, April 23, 2015 12:57 AM, Super-User <address@hidden> wrote:


Hello!

As the one who raise this topic, I would love to see this adding to the core (and well documented) when all gears' up, as it could be read by a billion and written by millions.
Seheme, as a dialect of Lisp, can be annotated with ;; so that our Scheme codes implementing Jianpu can be documented as well.
I have expressed my hope that this should be add to the core in a previous email, should Carl missed it.
I can write test cases, including edge cases, to keep this improving.

P.S. I prefer replacing "StaffJianpu" with "JianpuStaff", as with "DrumStaff" and "TabStaff"

David Zhang

------------------ Original ------------------
From: "Carl Sorensen";<address@hidden>;
Date: Thu, Apr 23, 2015 12:30 PM
To: "Paul Morris"<address@hidden>; "MING TSANG"<address@hidden>;
Cc: "Super-User"<address@hidden>; "address@hidden"<address@hidden>;
Subject: Re: Jianpu Notation


On 4/22/15 8:59 PM, "Paul Morris" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>Ok, the problem was that your music file was for LilyPond 2.19 and
>jianpu3.ly only works with 2.18.

Have you proposed adding this to LilyPond? It seems like this would be a
promising thing to add to the core, since it's another standard notation.

I guess the biggest problem we have with adding it to the core is that it
uses Scheme engravers, rather than C++ engravers, and we have no mechanism
for documenting Scheme engravers.

I think it would be worthwhile posting this to liypond-devel to start a
discussion about adding it to the core.

Thanks,

Carl




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]