Re: Feedback on lilypondblog article

[Noeck]

Dear Urs,

>> Yes, I wouldn't have thought of that possibility. Of course the
>> function should fallback to not trying to include a stylesheet then.
> 
> Fixed in
> https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/commit/37b6fef70eae3ecaa804fea03e0d711e931468f7

Thanks!

> Hm, did you try it out?

and

>> A help message (-h) would be nice -> how about using argparse? (Not
>> necessary for this low amount of options though.)
> 
> Huh?
> 
> python install-lily-fonts -h
> usage: install-lily-fonts [options]
> ...

I used
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/blob/master/fonts/install-lily-fonts.py
instead of
https://github.com/openlilylib/openlilylib/blob/master/py/font-install/install-lily-fonts

The fonts/install-lily-fonts.py is probably only a remainder from times
before the restructuring. This file duplication confuses me and I should
probably wait until it is completed and cleaned up, because I only
distract you from great work when trying to understand the current
temporary state.

Then things are different:
- The download is easy
- My wish for enhancement is already implemented (multiple targets)
  Anything more clever would be more difficult to understand.
- However it did not accept a folder with the extracted content of
  gutenberg-1939.zip as a font directory. Is the catalog necessary?

Cheers,
Joram