|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: ugly default output |
Date: | Sun, 01 Mar 2015 00:11:26 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0 |
Am 01.03.2015 um 00:07 schrieb Martin Tarenskeen:
On Sat, 28 Feb 2015, H. S. Teoh wrote:In my experience, lilypond tends to produce better output for longer pieces -- presumably because there's more room for adjustments to optimize the layout. Therefore I wouldn't judge just by the first few bars alone.I am well aware of that. I have no doubt it will look much better when the piece is complete. I just wanted to give a particular case of what can go wrong when typesetting such a smaller exerpt.
Yes, but I'd repeat that this is less LilyPond's fault than a problem of having an amount of music that is inherently unsuitable to be typeset nicely on one system.
-- Urs Liska www.openlilylib.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |