|
From: | Urs Liska |
Subject: | Re: ScholarLY - introduction and call for collaboration |
Date: | Wed, 28 Jan 2015 11:31:36 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0 |
Am 28.01.2015 um 11:11 schrieb Noeck:
why we use so many discrete projects and repositoriesI would like to second this. I am much more likely to check things out (and perhaps contribute to things) that are in the openlilylib snippets as this is the only repo I have checked out besides the lilypond git. All other repos would be an extra step and need extra motivation to do so. But of course you are free to organize GASP etc. however you want.
I hope my other reply is a sufficient answer to this?
Thanks for the blog post and the work behind it. From Urs’ questions on this list, I guess that the second last post on the blog was not the last one on partial compiling – which I find very exciting.
Yep. I definitely want to reach the state where I can recompile the currently edited system only - which would dramatically increase the responsiveness of editing LilyPond files.
Urs
Cheers, Joram _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list address@hidden https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |